3 Idiots is one of the finest movies I have watched of late. One movie which vouches many thoughts, applicable across trades. I always felt the education system in India needed changes, but something which required more change (read as guts) was one’s view towards education. According to Thesaurus, ‘System’ is analogous to ‘organization’ ‘arrangement’ ‘coordination’ ’scheme’, hence changing a system not only means changing an abstract framework, but also the way we look at the existing system. Few days back, during our annual appraisal, my Manager felt that the existing policies doesn’t take note of how critical and tough is it to work in a project like ours, during the appraisals and hence he was not able to get our team better ratings. I knew, that baffled me and I went on to speak things which may have been offensive but were facts. My take was that it was not the policy or my teams incapability that costed us the ratings, which we deserved, but it was the incapability of my Manager or rather mis-representation. I know these words could have irked my Manager, who has a mammoth experience behind him and doesn’t need to learn management from a newbie (word which I use to show that I am young hehehe), but he had the grace to listen to what I said. My take was that the policy is always there to guide us, and it is we who have to make best use (read as exploit) of the same.
When a friend of mine wrote that Education system has to change, I replied saying ‘It is the view of students, teachers and parents that has to change’. Education system as such never dictated that the one who scores best in all the subjects is the most brilliant one. A fact that is supported by the gradual specialisation road-map that is omnipresent in our education system. It has always been the student, teacher, parent who felt that scoring less is a sign of a dull mind. One can still argue saying, then why do we have a cut-off system, I would say the rule (scheme – analogy of system) is something which I still fail to justify. I can still counter argue that this rule can be ignored if we change the way look at marks. I was proven right on Jan 10 2005 (I remember the date since my best buddy Ravi got his job on that day) a day when Cognizant came for campus placements to Loyola. After the recruitment drive, during a casual stroll, the HR advised our Principal Fr. Francis Xavier (fondly called FX) that Loyola should give admission to only those candidates who have scored >60% in there previous exams. FX replied ‘ We don’t see pleasure in making a top-scorer into a graduate, but we find pleasure in making a non-top-scorer an efficient graduate.
People who knew me during my intermediate would agree that though I scored 95-100 in all subjects, I was never a person who can score good in competitive exams (EAMCET AIEEE…). I knew that I wouldn’t score good in the entrance exam, since I never liked byhearting the shortcut formulae in maths and arriving at an answer at the shortest time. Physics was one subject where I could understand a scenario or solve a problem in shortest time, because of my immense love towards the subject. I scored 49/50 in the entrance and scored much lesser in Maths out of 100 and I can still claim I never byhearted the end formulae, but I would derive them as and when needed. I still remember Mr Paul, my physics tutor asking a question ‘ What will happen when I carry a pendulum clock to a hill top’, within fraction of a minute I replied ‘It would run fast’ He asked why ? I said Time period = 2 pi sqrt(length of pendulum/acceleration due to gravity) and Force = GMm/(r*r) also F= mg hence g= GM/(r*r), where r is the distance from the center of earth to point of consideration. So as we move further up, we in fact move farther from the center of Earth so the value of ‘r’ increases and hence ‘g’ decreases. Now as ‘g’ decreases, the value of T increases. Hence the clock runs faster. Mr. Paul replied ‘Thats a brilliant approach, but the conclusion was wrong because as T( time period) increases the time taken for each oscillation increases, hence the clock runs slower and not faster.
Why did I mention this…. to boast about my physics ??? NO but to say that the conclusion is not the only thing that has to be acknowledged, but the thought process, the approach and the effort that is to be glorified. Once we start doing it, the so-called system would change by itself.

I was back at Bangalore after my 4 days vacation at Hyderabad. Though the vacation was mostly gloomy reflecting the mood of the ever-bindaas Hyderabad, because the state had lost one of its favourite sons YSR. I was at office when I read the news in ndtv.com that YSR had passed away, sudden-chilling feeling crossed me. I was to travel to Hyderabad the same day, my colleagues asked me if it was safe to travel back home at that moment of time. I told them that I was travelling to Hyderabad and not Chennai or Bangalore, where death of a famous celebrity or leader causes the whole city to be held at ransom. I landed back safe in Hyd and that too was too pleased to see the city at its normal in terms of transport, though I had asked my cousin to pick me up. The state really showed a really dignified behaviour in giving farewell to one of the finest leaders AP has ever had (This is my statement, I have always been an ardent follower of Chandra Babu Naidu, but YSR did impress me in the last 3 years of his tenure). Ganesh idol procession without the famous teen-mar band is the real act which can tell someone, (who knows the Hyderabadi’s style of Ganesh immersion, which stands on par with celebrations in Mumbai), how humane and dignified farewell can the city give to its leader. Drenching in rain had become my regular habit in those four days as I was shopping for my cousin who will be leaving to UK in few days.


